Discussion:
The legacy of mark foley....The truth about gay pedophilia
(too old to reply)
bobandcarole
2006-10-08 09:47:05 UTC
Permalink
The truth about 'gay' pedophilia
Liberals are experts at framing debates in their favor. Since the Foley
fiasco hit the news, the emphasis has been on evils lurking within the
Republican Party.
Incredibly, political editor Brian E. Crowley of the Palm Beach Post
opined, "Rumors that Foley is gay have swirled around him for years.
... But on Friday, whether Foley was a homosexual or a heterosexual no
longer seemed to matter."
Really? Why would that be considered inconsequential? Could it be
because the Democrat Party embraces legalizing homosexual marriage and
inserting homosexual material into public school textbooks designed for
children as young as grammar school, as demonstrated in recent efforts
by the California Legislature to indoctrinate students? That is the
real story behind this media blitz that Democrats want Americans to
miss.
While the leftist media focuses on the political ramifications
surrounding Foley in an effort to gain points for liberal candidates in
the upcoming election, the fact that a homosexual rather than a
heterosexual preyed on a young male is being oddly overlooked. Few
people are talking about it. And the question is "Why not?" The answer
is important because to ignore it is to dismiss the real plight of many
homosexuals today and their impact upon our culture, our children and
our political scene.
Foley admits that he is a homosexual. Dare the question be asked
whether homosexuals commit higher rates of molestation than
heterosexuals do? Or are the thought police hard at work silencing the
possible implications?
English professor Karla Jay, Ph.D., and well-educated journalist Allen
Young, both homosexual activists, conducted the first major survey on
homosexuality in America in 1979. Their work is still cited in academic
studies and involved over 5,000 homosexuals from all walks of life.
Titled "The Gay Report," the study published data on underage sex,
disease, gross promiscuity, suicidal tendencies and more.
One cannot help but applaud the honesty of these two homosexuals in
publishing the results of their study, which documented that "23
percent of respondents admitted to having had sex with youths aged
13-15, while 19 percent felt positive about sexual activity within this
age group." Tragically, 50 percent of the males in their survey
experienced their first sexual encounter at age 15 or less.
In spite of the fact that two gay researchers produced "The Gay
Report," radical homosexual activists dismiss it as outdated. This is
ironic considering they so often cite the much older 1948 "10 percent
of society is gay" statistic from the oft-disputed Alfred Kinsey study.
But out of courtesy for their concerns, are there other esteemed elites
drawing the same conclusions? Contrary to the homosexual assertion that
heterosexual molestations outnumber those committed by homosexuals,
Yale and Harvard-connected psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover states that
"careful studies show that pedophilia is far more common among
homosexuals than heterosexuals." Satinover adds, "The greater absolute
number of heterosexual cases reflects the fact that heterosexual males
outnumber homosexual males by approximately 36 to 1. Heterosexual child
molestation cases outnumber homosexual cases by only 11 to 1, implying
that pedophilia is more than three times more common among
homosexuals."
So considering the fact that this type of sexual interest is shown by
studies to occur more often in homosexual populations, is it any
surprise that Mark Foley admitted he himself was molested as a teenager
by a clergyman?
According to a report by Gregory Rogers featured on the website for the
National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, such
issues raise "immediate questions ... should gay priests be allowed
access to Sunday Schools or youth groups?" Instead of asking that
question, however, the liberal cohorts shift the spotlight off the
homosexuals themselves and onto the church as a whole, just as they're
now doing with the Republicans even though they themselves have a
stained record in this regard.
While pointing their fingers at Republicans, who may have overlooked
gross evil while focusing on political gain, liberals overlook a
tremendous evil themselves by ignoring the truth about homosexual
behavior. They fail to speak out for the innocent children caught in
the path of a rabid homosexual agenda fueled by wounded people who
refuse to change.
The truth is that the majority of Republicans oppose same-sex marriage
and the insertion of homosexual dogma into schools, while most
Democrats support it.
As David Kupelian states in his groundbreaking best seller "The
Marketing of Evil," "The end game is not only to bring about the
complete acceptance of homosexuality, including same-sex marriage, but
also to prohibit and even criminalize public criticism of
homosexuality."
And all of this at the expense of our children.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52330
Chris McGonnell
2006-10-09 18:09:42 UTC
Permalink
WON"T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN? It's true Republicans are
closeted gay pedophiles, but why are they blaming Democrats for their
sexual proclivities? God preverted them, not Andrew Jackson. I blame
God for not equalling G_uV.

--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951.
"My dog ate my gratitude journal." -- Paula
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Frank McCoy
2006-10-09 23:59:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris McGonnell
WON"T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN? It's true Republicans are
closeted gay pedophiles, but why are they blaming Democrats for their
sexual proclivities? God preverted them, not Andrew Jackson. I blame
God for not equalling G_uV.
Heh. What annoys me about the whole thing (and yet sometimes gives me a giggle
at the same time) is all the Republicans trying to somehow, any way possible,
shift the blame for the mess over to the Democrats by trying to suggest they
knew about it and brought it out right *now* to help shift the election; thus
making it a political ploy.

All the evidence though point to it being Republicans who knew about it
previously, tried to hide it until after the elections; so THEY were the ones
making hiding the issue into a political one. Not only that, but it is/was
other Republicans who:
A. Hid the issue.
B. Brought it to light.
(Different Republicans, of course.)

Mostly I've just seen Democrats slyly stepping BACK, OUT of the issue; and just
letting the Republicans stew in their own juice. After all, it isn't the
Democrats who make such big issues out of sex, but their opponents. And,
historically, while Republicans have been the ones to complain the loudest about
sexual issues, especially where Democrats are concerned (Like Slick Willy) THEY
are the ones who usually are caught more often with their pants down (Like when
every one of the Republicans yelling loudest about Clinton had their own
mistress problems at home). So, it's kind of nice to see them hoist by their
own petard.

As to "kids" ... Even 16-year-olds aren't really "children". Not in my book.
Not now, nor even back in the fifties. More than half such teenagers have
already been having sex, little as most anti-sex fanatics want to admit it. Nor
are 17-year-olds, nor especially are 23-year-old women lime Monica who go
CHASING politicians, and then BRAGGING about "getting lucky".

However, the page who got *unwanted* instant-messages is a far different matter,
to my notion. There is a difference. Foley should have been canned months ago;
and it's good he stepped down. Any person doing such things in a corporate
environment would have been fired within hours of anybody else finding out; and
the moment somebody (like the page) complained.

All the remaining crap is just politics.
The Republicans for trying to hide it past the elections.
The Democrats for trying to fan the flames.
(Of course, several Republicans are doing the same.)

It ain't about homosexuality or even "children"; it's about SEX!
The Republicans got into office by decrying illicit sex by Clinton as being
horrible, terrible, and completely unacceptable, when even his own wife didn't
complain publicly. So, this comes down to them getting bit by their own dog.

Just my opinion, of course.
YMMV.
The soapbox is empty.
NEXT!
--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
Loading...