Robert Buchanan
2006-11-24 03:08:19 UTC
In alt.support.girl-lovers Robert Buchanan
Actually funny.
Even a few truths in the whole spiel.
Lots of crap too; but that's pretty much a hallmark of humor.
Bravo!
See, now I can at least respect you to some degree, because anybody whoAfter a lively exchange with Frank McCoy, I must say: he's quite a
guy! Few people take the time to rationalize methods detailing how
and why
pedophilia, ephebophilia, and incest should be legalized, but he does
his
best and exerts quite a lot of effort into his attempts to do so!
Granted, he has some issues with the English language pertaining to
his
horrid misuse of apostrophes and pormanteaus (he really doesn't
understand how to use either of them), and like certain other kooks,
he *loves* to use *asterisks* for *emphasis* of *almost* every *other*
word when he's all *excited!* The more worked up over a subject that
Frank is (usually one that involves sex with children), the more those
asterisks become prominent to the point of ubiquity!
But the real fun to be derived from an exchange with Frank stems from
how
easily he's trolled. If I can troll somebody, anybody can, and a
successful trolling of Frank can consist of nothing more than asking
him questions about his views on sexuality while not being a prick to
him. You don't even have to be nice to him (admittedly, it's
difficult to be anything other than a prick to regulars of
alt.support.girl-lovers). Just act as though you're tolerant of
Frank, ask him questions related to his views on sex with children,
teenagers, and siblings, and look out! This will cause a flood of
text to flow freely from Frank's keyboard as he explains the logic of
legalizing pedophilia, ephebophilia, and incest in prolix miniature
essays.
Note the X-Troll header in my posts, in which I implemented a scoring
system based on the quantity of rationalization related to Frank's
perverted sensibilities that I could draw out of him, the number of
asterisks he used measured in relation to the amount of text he typed
in each of his posts, the success of each piece of bait I laid out for
him to excitedly devour, the moral reprehensibility of the views he
expressed, and his general degree of cluelessness. The tallied
Buchanan: 15.3
McCoy: -15.6
If you're not interested in trolling Frank and just want to annoy him,
insult his intelligence. He'll wack out satisfactorily, and the more
agitated he is, the less literate he becomes. It's fun! Frank's one
of the very few people I've come across on USENET who's so desperate
for acceptance and attention that he'll try to be civil after you've
insulted him if it means that he can express his precious, perverted
perspective in detail. You can be the good cop /and/ the bad cop!
Based on the MIDs of Frank's posts litsed above, and the majority of
his
posting output, I hereby nominate Frank McCoy for the Unabomber
Surprise.
Any seconds?
Heh, heh.guy! Few people take the time to rationalize methods detailing how
and why
pedophilia, ephebophilia, and incest should be legalized, but he does
his
best and exerts quite a lot of effort into his attempts to do so!
Granted, he has some issues with the English language pertaining to
his
horrid misuse of apostrophes and pormanteaus (he really doesn't
understand how to use either of them), and like certain other kooks,
he *loves* to use *asterisks* for *emphasis* of *almost* every *other*
word when he's all *excited!* The more worked up over a subject that
Frank is (usually one that involves sex with children), the more those
asterisks become prominent to the point of ubiquity!
But the real fun to be derived from an exchange with Frank stems from
how
easily he's trolled. If I can troll somebody, anybody can, and a
successful trolling of Frank can consist of nothing more than asking
him questions about his views on sexuality while not being a prick to
him. You don't even have to be nice to him (admittedly, it's
difficult to be anything other than a prick to regulars of
alt.support.girl-lovers). Just act as though you're tolerant of
Frank, ask him questions related to his views on sex with children,
teenagers, and siblings, and look out! This will cause a flood of
text to flow freely from Frank's keyboard as he explains the logic of
legalizing pedophilia, ephebophilia, and incest in prolix miniature
essays.
Note the X-Troll header in my posts, in which I implemented a scoring
system based on the quantity of rationalization related to Frank's
perverted sensibilities that I could draw out of him, the number of
asterisks he used measured in relation to the amount of text he typed
in each of his posts, the success of each piece of bait I laid out for
him to excitedly devour, the moral reprehensibility of the views he
expressed, and his general degree of cluelessness. The tallied
Buchanan: 15.3
McCoy: -15.6
If you're not interested in trolling Frank and just want to annoy him,
insult his intelligence. He'll wack out satisfactorily, and the more
agitated he is, the less literate he becomes. It's fun! Frank's one
of the very few people I've come across on USENET who's so desperate
for acceptance and attention that he'll try to be civil after you've
insulted him if it means that he can express his precious, perverted
perspective in detail. You can be the good cop /and/ the bad cop!
Based on the MIDs of Frank's posts litsed above, and the majority of
his
posting output, I hereby nominate Frank McCoy for the Unabomber
Surprise.
Any seconds?
Actually funny.
Even a few truths in the whole spiel.
Lots of crap too; but that's pretty much a hallmark of humor.
Bravo!
has the character to laugh at themselves deserves some acnkowledgement.
Everybody give the guy the clap!
;-}
No need; I've been vaccinated.;-}
--
Robert Buchanan
<http://www.robertbuchanan.name/>
<http://www.simpy.com/user/rbuchanan>
Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18
Robert Buchanan
<http://www.robertbuchanan.name/>
<http://www.simpy.com/user/rbuchanan>
Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18