Post by Frank McCoyPost by GentlyPost by Frank McCoyPost by GentlyI didn't include the story here, because I am new to the posting
in newsgroups, and didn't want to offend folks that have seen it a
million times. I will post it if you like, just let me know.
This isn't the newsgroup to post stories in.
This is just for fans of ... Well, me.
Discussions, announcements, conversation, questions, etc.
Well, good. Then I an glad I didn't post it. :)
Post by Frank McCoyPost by GentlyANYWHO....
I loved the story and want to read more. Frank, I am not sure of your tag
at the end that mentions Pedro. Did he write the story, or just create the
character of Mr. Ped?
Uh ... He created the character.
I used Sam in two of my stories.
Ahhh, ok. :)
Oh oh, I forgot to say in my earlier post... When I started to read
your story I thought it was going to be a quick, get to the sex with
kids story and it wasn't. Now, when I go to read a story in a sex
newsgroup, I expect
lots of sex and some structure. Your story was the other way round.
You've
heard the saying that you want to look away, but you can't. Well,
that applied here. You wrote such an engaging story, that I had to
find out what
happened! My god, had you writen an entire novel about the little
girl Candy, I would have been up all night reading it. Sleep? Who
needs sleep, I
have to know what happens next! :) Thankyou for taking the time to
write stories of this caliber.
Ah, thanks indeed. That's probably the best compliment I've ever
had on a story ... or at least the kind I appreciate most.
Usually my stories *are* more the other kind: Get to the sex in a
hurry, and include story only if indicated. (Sorry about that: But
*most* of my stories start out as wet-dreams.) If you like my
stories more as *stories* though, I suggest you look more into those
I've written in Write Club Duels; though a few others here and there
also qualify.
Many others were mainly intended to just *be* sex stories of the
porno-type, where the sex is the main issue and the point or humor
or propaganda is secondary or even tertiary. A noticeable
percentage of even the longer ones (like "A teenaged boy's fantasy")
being mainly pure whack-off material where as many sex scenes as
possible are jammed together in as little space as available, just
like a modern porno movie. While each story *does* have a point to
make, humor to bring smiles, and (of course) my ever-present
propaganda about how sex with love and caring is *immeasurably*
better than sex where your partner is just a piece of meat, some do
tend to be more sex than story ... while on the other hand, a few
deliberately do tend to more story than sex.
I'll admit that I do tend more towards the first than the last ...
mostly because it seems I get better responses to the sex than to
the stories. So, it becomes more gratifying to produce them.
Post by GentlyPost by Frank McCoyPost by GentlyI indentified with the main character, in that, he loves little girls, but
does NOT like to see them in pain. It breaks my heart to hear about kids
being forced to have sex and have some scum bag film it. They
should all
be
shot.
Amen.
But what about little exhibitionists who *love* to show off to a camera?
Those are the best kinds! They are very sexy and they know it. I
think they should be offered the chance to have sex. Because being
outgoing and open to the camera, means to me that they understand
people like to look at
them. The next logical thing to me would be to offer to make them feel even
better. And in the action of that, getting some feel good stuff for
yourself.
Post by Frank McCoyShould they be denied this and punished for wanting to?
Denied? Punished? For being photogenic? Would someone do such a
thing? I would like to know who. Are we referring to the web cam
kids that expose themselves and get punished by their parents?
Not for being photogenic, but for exhibiting themselves.
If you show off your body, then (obviously) you feel sexy.
If you feel sexy, then likely you *will* soon have sex!
Society in general, and many parents think kids should be punished
for even thinking about having sex, or doing anything that might
lead to sex. This is usually done under the auspices of "protecting
the children from predators". "Predators" who will teach a child to
enjoy sex.
Sex, you see, is *evil*. Sex is *bad*. Even adults are seduced by
sex. From there you get into the idea that (since kids are
"innocent") that only a pervert of an adult will teach kids about
sex ... because kids aren't interested unless some adult shows them
the perverted pleasures of sex. (Yeah, right.)
This (of course) is the ULTIMATE evil: Teaching kids to *like*
doing something evil like sex. That's the logic behind the modern
hysteria about pedophilia and perverts.
After all, if sex is evil, (nakedness is evil, exhibitionism is
evil, etc.) then teaching an "innocent child" to like being evil is,
well, about as horrible as you can get.
Now if you personally don't believe sex is evil and an invention of
the Devil, then to understand the moralist abhorrence to the idea
you'd have to imagine instead some *real* pervert teaching a child
to enjoy torturing small animals and (eventually) other children as
a kind of "fun thing". What's strange, is that in *our* society
such a person is far more *admired* than somebody who teaches a
young girl that it's OK to masturbate.
That's why I think our society is *sick*.
(Of course, most of Society thinks *I* am sick, so ....)
I thing sex is a pleasure none of us should be ashamed to enjoy.
If God created us (a dubious thought) then He created us *with* sex,
and intended us to enjoy it; otherwise He would have made it
painful. And, if God had wanted us to run around naked, He would
have had us being born that way. Uh ... Waitaminit ....
Well, you get the idea.
My idea of REAL perverts is those who take God's Gift of sexuality
to Man and turn it into a perversion that's evil instead of being
the wonderful thing He originally made it. Instead of being
something hidden, done in the dark, and behind closed doors, sex,
nudity, and the human body should be *celebrated* as the wonderful
Gifts they are ... in the open and as something all should see ...
yes, even or *especially* children should be taught that nakedness
and even sex are things we *like* to do, not things to be ashamed of
and hidden away like something slimy and smelly we accidentally
stepped on, on the lawn.
Post by GentlyPost by Frank McCoyJust like not all sex is abuse, not all filming of kids having sex
is either ... no matter what Society claims. Of course, it often
*becomes* abusive when busybodies in Society find out ....
Note: When, not if.
Wow. Now that was a loaded statement. Can you explain a sistuation
that you may have heard about, to clarify what you mean by
"*becomes* abusive"?
When Parents learn their kids have been "showing off" and punish
them for doing so ... and if the parents don't, then when the
Enforcers of our society (LEA, Social Workers, etc.) do so instead.
All this in the name of "protecting the children from abuse" ... by
abusing the children until they agree that sex *is* evil, and
therefore won't do it again. The idea being that if children thing
sex is nasty and terrible, they won't then be "taken in" by perverts
who tell them it's nice fun.
And so, we get a whole new generation of kids who have a horror of
sex, knowing it's bad, evil, and something to protect the next
generation from. ;-{
Post by GentlyPost by Frank McCoyPost by GentlyBut on the other hand, I would love to teach young girls what it
is to be in a loving sexual relationship. Or would love to be the
first person
to show them how to masterbate themselves. Anything that make
them feel good, and doesn't hurt them. I am also sensitive to
psycological impact on
them, but not real knowlegable about it.
Please, everyone, share your thoughts on what I have said. I am not a bad
person, I just like little girls. :)
Probably should be posted to alt.support.girl-lovers.
;-}
Hehe, true enough. :)
Well ... That group *is* the place for such discussions.
alt.sex.stories.d is the group for discussing *stories*.
And this group ... is the group for discussing me, my stories, and
anything else that's even vaguely related.
So, you *did* post the message in the right place.
Post by GentlyThis is only the 3rd time I have posted to a newsgroup in the MANY years of
"reading" newsgroups. Do you remember when you had to wait to
download newsgroups on the 2400 baud modems. hehe, I do.
Well: I started out on BBS systems at 300 baud; going up to 1200 baud
was *quite* a thrill. From there I got most of my stories from
downloading from a whole list of BBS systems that were all the rage
at the time. I first learned about alt.sex.stories through a
"gateway" from the one BBS I subscribed-to by paying. This was just
about the time I went from 2400 baud to 33k. Wow!
It was also about the time I decided that "Her Father's Daughter"
was too darned good a story to keep to myself and the four people
involved in its production. So, with approval, I posted the thing
first to several BBS collections, and then (when the propagation
seemed too slow) in 114 horrible parts to alt.sex.stories because
the BBS gateway would only take 43K chunks.
I must have gotten over 200 frantic requests for reposts of parts,
where various sections, for one reason or another, didn't come
through whole.
I say, "114 *horrible* parts", because the original formatting
grammar, and most-especially the punctuation was abhominable (with
an 'h').
Several kind people gave me much needed lessons in comma placement,
what semicolons are for ... and most-especially how to properly
punctuate direct-quotes. Something I had learned years earlier,
then forgotten.
Ah well.
By the time I had the story corrected (but *not* modified!) so that
it was more readable, I had a *real* connection to the newsgroups.
The story hasn't changed; just the punctuation ... mainly. A few
minor mistakes were corrected as well.
Post by GentlyHeck, for a while there, I laughed when someone said they, read, newsgroups.
Ya right, just like people read porn mags for the articles. :) But
more recently, I have found that there are subjects on newsgroups
that let people
stay semi-anonymous and share how they feel about things. For
example, I would never come out and say that I love little girls to
sit on my lap, and
would love to touch them all over. But here, I feel that there are
enough people that feel the same way, that I can speak freely.
I think I'm rambling. Anyway, thanks Frank, for giving stories about child
interaction a lot more class. Keep writing. :)
Am. I really *should* do more posting though.
Wish I could figure a way to make some money from the writing ....
stories could send donations to. And on every story posted, you
should include a location to download other stories. Maybe even start
from the mind of Frank Mccoy. Of course this means that you would
subscribers. :) More work for you, but with some profit involved.
web page host that would be willing to host the content that we love.
Content that would be strictly text, with no images allowed.