On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:30:05 -0800, Brandon D Cartwright
Post by Brandon D CartwrightPost by DavidOn Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:52:49 -0800, Brandon D Cartwright
Post by Brandon D CartwrightPost by DavidOn Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:45:16 -0800, Brandon D Cartwright
Post by Brandon D CartwrightPost by DavidOn Fri, 04 Jan 2008 08:12:00 -0800, Brandon D Cartwright
[...]
Post by Brandon D CartwrightPost by DavidThe only people I accuse of lying are those who lie. You are a liar.
As I never tire of repeating,your words speak for themselves.
You may think yourself clever and erudite but your desires differ in
no way from any other pervert and sex predator..
" I want to free children from the tyranny
of externally imposed celibacy. "
Funny that that message ID does not appear on google. It does sound
like something I would have said though.
Give it a chance.. you had only just posted it..
Post by DavidJust for your information you should note that the sentence mentions
children, not adults.
You are referring to children being " free" to have sex with adult
pedophiles. They should have sex with anyone the want to have sex with
..remember?
That is true. It is the children that should be free, not the adults.
Any suspicion of force or coercion, by anyone, should be dealt with as
rape or assault.
Once again the master of deception and lies proves his ability do
distort and misread what is being said.
Nothing distorted or misread..
You advocate children being "free" for adult pedophiles to have sex
with as long as they consent.
No! As stated the children should be free to have sex with whomever
THEY choose. If they CHOOSE to have sex with an adult then that is
their right.
You do not have the moral standing to stop them just a religious
clap-trap minority loudly demanding that sex should be illegal for
children because it is a SIN and children are pure and unsullied.
You do not have a moral right to make a decision for a child provided
that the child has been properly educated. Of course your morals do
not permit the instruction of children about sex because you see it as
something dirty and evil. Your morals do not want anyone to enjoy sex
because it might "corrupt" them.
Post by Brandon D CartwrightGrooming children to "consent" to sex with them is the stock in trade
of pedophiles..
Once again you see "paedophiles", sorry that should be "child
molesters" lurking under every rock and fallen leaf. If the children
are educated about grooming tactics and about sex then no child
molester would get a look in.
The current set of laws are plainly not working with young children
being convicted of sex offences and labelled as sex offenders for the
rest of their lives. Do you consider that moral or just?
Is it moral or just that a young man gets convicted because he is less
than a year older than his partner but she is under the age of
consent? He gets convicted of rape and the two lovers are torn apart
and both their lives ruined.
Is it moral and just that two thirteen year old children are both cast
as victim and and both as perpetrator with both of them having to
register as a sex offender for the rest of their lives? It was
consensual but both are convicted of rape purely because of the age of
the partner to the act.
How can you stand idly by and see the lives of children ruined in this
way gloating that another paedophile has been incarcerated? Do you
want to put all these children in an asylum and allow medical
experiments to be performed on them? Do you want to harvest their
organs because they are "paedophiles" in your definition? Why do you
promote the torture and unusual punishment of anyone?
You are a moral disgrace and a distorting liar as well.
--
Regards
David
fundamentalism (n.): fund = give cash to; amentalism = brainlessness